Values in Care
    For institutions

    Check it before you pilot it.

    The workspace works today with no account and no integration. Try it in one setting, measure whether people can use it, and decide from that.

    Talk about a pilotTry the workspace
    See the evidence

    No account. No integration. No patient data. Limitations published.

    Three people reviewing an illustrative, non-identifiable conversation brief around a table
    Illustrative image. No real patient, health information, or partner organization is depicted.

    14

    Tradition and worldview guides

    255

    Citations in the dataset

    180

    Published evidence claims

    3

    Interface languages, including right-to-left

    Current product inventory, derived from dataset version 1.24.1. These are coverage counts. They are not adoption, effectiveness, revenue, or partner metrics.

    The bet

    A shared one-page brief makes a values conversation more focused and easier to pass on.

    That is a hypothesis, and it has not been tested yet.

    What exists today

    A brief workspace that needs no account, with prompts on faith, meaning, language, family, and uncertainty, each with its sources.

    1. Scope one workflow

      One setting, one audience, one kind of conversation. Start with what is already public. No account, no integration.

    2. Agree on the measures first

      Can people finish it, does it fit the time they have, do they come back, what needed correcting, what went wrong. Decide before results exist. A small pilot cannot show clinical effect.

    3. Then decide

      What got used, what got abandoned, what needed fixing, and whether a team version is worth building.

    What a pilot would measure

    Whether people can use it, before anyone claims it helps

    These are proposed measures. There are no results yet. A feasibility pilot cannot show clinical effect, and we will not read one as if it did.

    Completion feasibility

    Can intended users finish a non-identifiable brief for the scoped workflow?

    Completion and abandonment

    Workflow burden

    Does preparation fit the available time and attention?

    Time to brief and friction notes

    Repeat value

    Do users choose to return after the first guided use?

    Repeat use and stated intent

    Content quality

    Where do prompts need correction, clarification, or stronger boundaries?

    Corrections and assumption flags

    Governance

    • Use non-identifiable content only; never enter patient or health information.
    • Preparation support is limited to conversation preparation; clinical, legal, spiritual, and billing determinations remain with the appropriate professionals.
    • Person-specific preferences must be asked and confirmed, never inferred.
    • Public sources, limitations, coverage, and corrections remain inspectable.

    No contract, account, integration, or server-side intake. Entries stay in the user's browser. Analytics and the contact form have their own disclosed data flows. Your privacy office should still review shared-device and local-storage risk. Never enter patient or health information.

    Why there are no logos here

    Open reference

    Public guidance, sources, and individual tools are available without a paid workspace today.

    Available now

    Founding pilot

    A bounded implementation and evidence-building engagement.

    Case by case

    Governed team workspace

    Built only after repeat value, safety, operational fit, and willingness to pay are demonstrated.

    Future gate

    No partner logos, testimonials, retention numbers, or outcome claims, because none exist yet. This page keeps what exists, what is proposed, and what is hoped for apart.

    Due diligence

    Check it, do not take our word

    Independent expert review remains incomplete. Start with the public evidence and the known gaps.

    MethodologyHow sources are selected and gradedIntegrity reportWhat passed, failed, and last ranCoverage mapWhat is covered and what is missingPrivacy boundaryWhat stays local and what is measuredIndependence & fundingEditorial safeguards before any future support

    Free, no agreement needed

    Link to the Decision Guide from your site

    Copy a plain link card for a patient portal, clinic page, or advocacy site. For staff, the care-team conversation guide prints on one page.

    Preview

    Preparing for a healthcare decision? Name what matters to you and leave with one page of questions. About ten minutes. Values in Care · Free, no account. Notes stay on your device. Educational, not medical advice.

    HTML to paste

    <a href="https://valuesincare.com/navigator" target="_blank" rel="noopener"
   style="display:block;max-width:420px;padding:16px 18px;border:1px solid #c9ced6;border-radius:10px;background:#ffffff;color:#1b2430;font:15px/1.45 system-ui,sans-serif;text-decoration:none">
  <strong style="display:block;font-size:16px">Preparing for a healthcare decision?</strong>
  <span style="display:block;margin-top:4px">Name what matters to you and leave with one page of questions. About ten minutes.</span>
  <span style="display:block;margin-top:8px;font-size:13px;color:#4a5563">Values in Care · Free, no account. Notes stay on your device. Educational, not medical advice.</span>
</a>

    A plain link. No script, no frame, no tracking parameters. The link carries only the care moment. What a person writes stays in their own browser, and your site receives nothing from it.

    Bring one use case.

    We want program leaders in hospice, chaplaincy, and serious illness who will run one narrow workflow and tell us what fails.

    No PHIBounded scopePredefined measures
    Talk about a pilotWhere Pro is going

    Values in Care is an independent research and educational project serving patients, families, caregivers, clinicians, chaplains, and other care partners. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, reviewed by, or representing any employer, health system, payer, religious institution, interfaith body, or other organization unless a specific relationship is explicitly documented.

    Institutional pilot brief · Dataset 1.24.1

    Values in Care

    A workspace for preparing a serious-illness conversation and passing it on, with every source cited.

    What exists today

    • 14 Tradition and worldview guides
    • 255 Citations in the dataset
    • 180 Published evidence claims
    • 3 Interface languages, including right-to-left
    • A working, local-first Conversation Brief Workspace
    • Public methodology, integrity, coverage, privacy, and correction pathways

    Proposed founding pilot

    1. Scope one workflow: One setting, one audience, one kind of conversation. Start with what is already public. No account, no integration.
    2. Agree on the measures first: Can people finish it, does it fit the time they have, do they come back, what needed correcting, what went wrong. Decide before results exist. A small pilot cannot show clinical effect.
    3. Then decide: What got used, what got abandoned, what needed fixing, and whether a team version is worth building.

    Proposed measures, no results yet.

    • Completion feasibility: Completion and abandonment
    • Workflow burden: Time to brief and friction notes
    • Repeat value: Repeat use and stated intent
    • Content quality: Corrections and assumption flags

    Boundaries

    • Use non-identifiable content only; never enter patient or health information.
    • Preparation support is limited to conversation preparation; clinical, legal, spiritual, and billing determinations remain with the appropriate professionals.
    • Person-specific preferences must be asked and confirmed, never inferred.
    • Public sources, limitations, coverage, and corrections remain inspectable.

    Explore: valuesincare.com/pro/workspace
    Discuss a pilot: hello@valuesincare.com

    Values in Care is an independent research and educational project serving patients, families, caregivers, clinicians, chaplains, and other care partners. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by, sponsored by, reviewed by, or representing any employer, health system, payer, religious institution, interfaith body, or other organization unless a specific relationship is explicitly documented.