Values in Care

    Cultural dimensions

    Values are not only religious.

    Language, how much a person wants to be told, migration, disability, distance, and cost all shape care. They sit alongside faith, not under it.

    Published

    Every practice below cites a verified source. The evidence itself lives on Care Frameworks; these pages point at it rather than restating it.

    Declared, not published

    These dimensions matter and are missing. Each names the review it awaits. Writing them without that review is the harm the review exists to prevent, so nothing here has invented narrative.

    • LGBTQ+ people

      Awaiting review

      Identity-affirming care, chosen family, confidentiality, and the risk of a tradition summary being used to invalidate a person.

      Gap G15 (P0) requires paid LGBTQ+ and intersex patient and specialist review, privacy-by-design and safe-display controls, and an explicit prohibition on using religious summaries to invalidate identity or withhold standard care. Publishing this written alone would be the harm the gap describes.

    • Disability

      Awaiting review

      Supported decision-making, communication access, and separating decisional capacity from diagnosis.

      Gap G12 (P0) requires a disability-led review group, anti-ableist review, and safeguards against substituted quality-of-life assumptions. A non-disabled author writing this unreviewed is the failure mode.

    • Immigration and displacement

      Awaiting review

      How immigration status, displacement, and prior experience of institutions shape what feels safe to say to a care team.

      Sourced claims can now be verified (the citation pipeline reaches PubMed), but this dimension also requires review by people with the lived experience of migration and displacement before publication. Held for that review.

    • Economic pressure

      Awaiting review

      When cost, transport, work, and caregiving capacity constrain what a person can actually choose.

      Gap G11 (P0) requires distinguishing preferred, chosen, available, delivered, and declined before this can be stated responsibly, since a preference framed as free choice is misleading when the option was never available.

    Why there is no comparison grid

    A table of groups against clinical topics reads as a lookup, and a lookup gets used to predict someone, profile them, or overrule what they said. So the data has no field that can hold a group position on a clinical question. It carries practices and questions.

    What this resource does not do
    Was this page helpful?