Values in Care

    Traditions & Worldviews

    How diverse faith traditions and secular, humanist, and existential worldviews approach serious illness, dying, and meaning-making at the end of life. Each entry is a starting-point guide for inquiry, not a definitive playbook. Practices vary widely by denomination, sect, culture, and individual.

    Dataset version 1.22.2 · last verified 2026-09-01

    Compare faith positions on medical decisions (DNR, ANH, sedation, hospice) →

    Faith is one dimension of values, not the whole of it. See cultural dimensions for language, disclosure norms, and the rest.

    Not medical, legal, or spiritual advice. These are starting-point guides drawn from scholarly and clinical literature, not definitive playbooks. Traditions vary internally by denomination, sect, region, lineage, generation, and individual practice. Secular and humanist worldviews are equally diverse. Always confirm specifics with the individual and their own faith leader, chaplain, humanist celebrant, or care team. They never supersede a patient's voiced wishes, advance directives, or legal health care proxy. Always ask the individual directly.

    Why This Matters

    Understanding a patient's tradition or worldview (religious or secular) can transform end-of-life care from clinical protocol to meaningful partnership. Approach with humility: ask, don't assume. That isn't just a slogan: see the peer-reviewed evidence behind it and the printable bedside prompts.

    Coverage across traditions reflects available sources and current capacity. We welcome guidance from community scholars, secular/humanist leaders, and chaplains to expand and correct gaps: contact us to contribute.

    Orthodox Christianity

    Orthodox Christianity (Greek, Antiochian, Russian/OCA, and other jurisdictions) understands death not as annihilation but as a ‘falling asleep’ (κοίμησις) and passage to eternal life. The Church's funeral and Unction prayers explicitly ask for a Christian ending to life — ‘painless, blameless, peaceful.’ A sharp moral line separates allowing a natural, unhastened death (permitted) from actively causing death through euthanasia or assisted suicide (never permitted); pain relief and comfort care are affirmed without reservation.

    Citation review pending

    Sourced from Orthodox Church in America (OCA) and Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America (GOARCH) bioethics resources. Not yet verified against the original source, and not yet independently reviewed by an Orthodox chaplain or ethicist. Positions can vary by jurisdiction and priest; always confirm with the family's own clergy.

    Baháʼí Faith

    The Baháʼí Faith teaches that the soul is immortal and continues progressing toward God after death, which is described as a new birth rather than an ending. The Universal House of Justice, the Faith's supreme governing body, has not legislated specifically on euthanasia or withdrawal of life support, leaving such decisions to individual conscience in consultation with competent physicians and, where possible, the patient. Baháʼí burial law, set out in the Kitáb-i-Aqdas, is specific and clinically relevant: burial (never cremation) within an hour's journey of the place of death.

    Citation review pending

    Sourced from the Baháʼí Reference Library (bahai.org) and Lights of Guidance (a published compilation of Universal House of Justice and Guardian correspondence). Not yet verified against the original source, and not yet independently reviewed by a Baháʼí community member or ethicist. Formal institutional bioethics guidance is less centrally published than for some other traditions in this dataset; several positions here reflect the explicit absence of specific legislation rather than a stated position.

    More Traditions Coming

    We're expanding to include more traditions. Request one below.

    Was this page helpful?